PA22/05411 | Outline application for 40 units with associated open space. All matters reserved except access (resubmission of PA
Submitted by Cornwall Counci... on Mon, 27/06/2022 - 00:00.
PA22/05411
|
Outline application for 40 units with associated open
space. All matters reserved except access (resubmission of PA21/05008).
|
Land North West Of Angarrack Lane Angarrack Lane Connor Downs Hayle Cornwall TR27 5JF
Reference | PA22/05411 |
---|---|
Alternative Reference | PP-11307200 |
Application Validated | Mon 20 Jun 2022 |
Address | Land North West Of Angarrack Lane Angarrack Lane Connor Downs Hayle Cornwall TR27 5JF |
Proposal | Outline application for 40 units with associated open space. All matters reserved except access (resubmission of PA21/05008). |
Status | Awaiting decision |
Appeal Status | Unknown |
Appeal Decision |
There are 25 documents associated with this application.
There is 1 case associated with this application.
There is 1 property associated with this application.
Outline Application with some matters reserved for up to forty units with associated open space - Land North West Of Angarrack Lane Angarrack Lane Connor Downs Hayle Cornwall TR27 5JF
Ref. No: PA21/05008 | Received date: Tue 11 May 2021 | Status: Pending Consideration | Case Type: Planning Application
Heads of Terms
Angarrack Lane, Connor Downs
Affordable Housing
On site provision 50%Comprising;60% Affordable Rented40% Shared Ownership
Filter By:
You can select up to 25 documents to download in one archive file at a time.
| Date Published | Document Type | Measure | Drawing Number | Description | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29 Jun 2021 | Plan - Site and Block | ![]() | 0101A | ![]() | ||
28 Jun 2021 | Assessment - Open Space | ![]() | ![]() | |||
28 Jun 2021 | Plan - Site Location | ![]() | 100 | ![]() | ||
17 Jun 2021 | Statement - Affordable Housing | ![]() | ![]() | |||
17 Jun 2021 | Statement - Design and Access | ![]() | ![]() | |||
17 Jun 2021 | Supporting Information | ![]() | HEAD OF TERMS | ![]() | ||
17 Jun 2021 | Statement - Planning | ![]() | ![]() | |||
11 May 2021 | Miscellaneous | ![]() | ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Tree Survey/Report | ![]() | TREE SURVEY REPORT | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Plan - Other | ![]() | 20102 - 001 - B - HIGHWAY ACCESS | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Plan - Other | ![]() | 20102 - 002 - A - TRANSPORT LINKS | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Assessment - Transport | ![]() | 20102 - ANGARRACK LANE CONNOR DOWNS - TRANSPORT STATEMENT A | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Plan - Other | ![]() | 1701_0120_P1_IMPERMEABLE AREA PLAN | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Plan - Drainage | ![]() | 1701_0500_P1_ATTENUATED DRAINAGE LAYOUT | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Plan - Drainage | ![]() | 1701_0505_P1_INFILTRATED DRAINAGE LAYOUT | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Plan - Other | ![]() | 1701_ATTENUATION POND DESIGN | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Correspondence | ![]() | 1701_INFILTRATION POND DESIGN | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Assessment - Flood Risk | ![]() | FLOOD RISK ASSESSEMNT | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Assessment - Land Contamination | ![]() | GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL DESK TOP STUDY | ![]() | ||
11 May 2021 | Application Form | ![]() | APPLICATION FORM | ![]() |
a
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments
- Permalink
Contributions
- Angarrack Defibrillator Team (25)
- Angarrack Inn (336)
- Angarrack Methodist Chapel (3)
- Carol (15)
- Gail (1)
- GordonG (12)
- Hayle Development Group on Facebook (5)
- Hayle Harbour Authority (4)
- Hayle Town Council (5)
- louise (1)
- Lynne (100)
- Mal (1)
- MattBuckley66 (9)
- Neil (22)
- Neils Garden Care (9)
- Russell (21)
- Secretary - Christmas Lights (125)
- Steve (3)
- webmaster (5081)
Book page
tags in
Similar
- 220627 | 40 new homes in village | Connor Downs | and north west of Angarrack Lane, Connor Downs
- 210721 | Upset over bid to build 40 new homes in village 'changed beyond recognition'
- PA21/05008 | Outline Application with some matters reserved for up to forty units with associated open space | Land North West O
- 220622 | A30 partially blocked and queueing traffic following two-car crash
- WITHDRAWN: PA21/02265 | Outline planning permission: Construction Dwelling House | Land North West Of 13 Riverside
Similar across site
- PA22/05411 | Outline application for 40 units with associated open space. All matters reserved except access (resubmission of PA
- 220627 | 40 new homes in village | Connor Downs | and north west of Angarrack Lane, Connor Downs
- 210721 | Upset over bid to build 40 new homes in village 'changed beyond recognition'
- PA21/05008 | Outline Application with some matters reserved for up to forty units with associated open space | Land North West O
- 220622 | A30 partially blocked and queueing traffic following two-car crash
Gwinear Gwithian Parish Council Comment Date: Fri 14 Feb 2025
1. Improvements to Angarrack Lane.
' The development of a 40 dwelling estate will result in an immediate uplift in the number of vehicles using this lane, with no paved footpath, or provision to create one. Therefore Angarrack Lane should be designated a 20 mile speed limit from the eastern entrance from Gwinear Road for a distance of 950 metres west wood.
' That at no point in this 950 metres should the lane be any narrower than 5.5 metres.
' That Vehicle Activated Signs (VAS) should be placed at the east and west access to this stretch of road.
' That in addition to the Chicanes at either entrance Speed Cushions should be installed at the minimum legal distance. These will reduce vehicle speeds, without creating problems for public transport.
' We note the Highways Officer's comment 'I have no highways objection subject to a condition securing a shower and changing facilities and secure, sheltered cycle parking'
These five points should be a condition in any planning approval.
2. Affordable Housing Allocation.
The Parish Council notes that this planning application being outside of the settlement boundary of Connor Downs, and therefore on a green field site offers the minimum number of affordable homes, i.e. only 50%.
Furthermore the actual number of affordable homes to rent is actually only 35% i.e. 14 dwellings, with a further 15% i.e. 6 dwellings designated as 'shared ownership.
The Parish Council is in receipt of a redacted copy of the feasible viability study, presented by the applicant justifying the grounds for this low provision of affordable rental properties.
Therefore we request that the Parish Chair together with the Parish Clerk is informed by the Cornwall Council Affordable Housing Officer of any issue (s) they may have with this report. Together with an up to date copy of the 'Homechoice Register' in order to be able to assess if this application meets the criteria for a green field development.
Until such information is provide the Parish Council cannot support this application.
3. The location of bungalows and properties for residents with disabilities.
The sightings of the four one bedroom bungalows at the southern edge of the site, along Angarrack Lane, are the most distant from the facilities in Connor Downs, i.e. the surgery, convenience store, W I Hall, Church and bus stops.
The Parish Council would prefer if these bungalows, together with any other dwelling that may be offered to a family with a disabled member, be located on the north east corner of the development site with a direct access to Prouts Lane, offering immediate entry to all the village facilities.
The Parish Council cannot support this application as presented.
4. The Management and Maintenance of the Open Space and Footpath
The Parish Council requests that a condition in granting approval of this application is included regarding the footpath leading from the proposed development to the Elizabeth Sampson Park, concerning its maintenance and management.
5. Communications between Treveth and Gwinear-Gwithian Parish Council.
The Parish Council informs the planning officer that no formal request as been submitted by Treveth concerning the creation of an entry into the Elizabeth Sampson Park, its design or costs. Until such details are provided the Parish Council will not permit any access into the Park from the applicant's site.
The Parish Council cannot support this application until we are in receipt of the planning officer's response to points 1 to 4.
Miss Janet Spreadborough Comment submitted date: Sun 20 Oct 202
Further to my previous comments, I am adding this again due to a word error.
From this plan it clearly shows that you are keeping the gateway near Prouts Lane as a pedestrian point. This is a hidden gateway right in the path of oncoming cars from Angarrack Village. As well as this huge motorhomes, caravans, farm machinery including tractors use Trenawin lane to turn into Angarrack Lane, which is directly opposite this gateway. This is putting all residents using this site at a huge risk and this should be removed as this is so dangerous. My suggestion is fill this in and place a cornish hedge in place of the gate. You cannot allow such a high risk pedestrian access point to stay.
Comment submitted date: Sun 20 Oct 2024
PA24/06664 Planning ObjectionsMy concerns are many:
Traffic and infrastructure: The application takes no account of the very substantial traffic southwards down Angarrack Lane. Angarrack Lane is a very dangerous road and when the initial outline planning was granted the Council evidence was not accurate (this is a polite way of saying they lied). The number of users is high, instead of the figures used somewhere between 8 or 12 cars per day it is nearer 500. I have done several surveys, as have my neighbours, in peak summer season 148 cars in 40 minutes is common. Furthermore Treveth have taken no account of the huge increase of traffic shortly arising from a large housing development at Copper Hills, a future remit of 2000 new homes in hayle, multiple camp sites in this area, an ever expanding industrial estate in Angarrack, a large farm and agricultural business base in Connor Downs. Agricultural here is a staple business with pig farms, large fields of crops, wheat, stock and with that large agricultural machinery that can just get through Angarrack lane due to their size. Many of these vehicles need to turn south down Angarrack Lane, past the dangerous pedestrian estate access at the junction with Trenawin Lane. This is just madness.
The width of Angarrack Lane is too narrow at 4.8m, it needs to be 5.5m in line with a rural exception site, this was highlighted by your preliminary reports indicating you could only proceed with this application if it was 5.5m. Given the amount of use on this lane for a rural area the amount of parking bays on this development is far too high.
Access onto Angarrack Lane
From this plan it clearly shows that you are keeping the gateway near Prouts Lane as a pedestrian point. This is a hidden gateway right in the path of oncoming cars from Angarrack Village, as well as this huge motorhomes, caravans, farm machinery including tractors use Trenawin lane to turn into Angarrack Lane which is directly opposite this gateway. This is putting all residents using this site at a huge risk and this should not be removed.
Village Facilities
No school places available - no expansion of the school. Official guidance is that a maximum capacity figure of 90% must be available before planning is approved. For Connor Downs the figure is 98%.
A shared GP practice with another village
3 bus stops a long way from this site, not all with a shelter, leaving disabled people trapped in their home if they cant drive or get to the stops due to mobility issues. Prouts lane is inaccessible and under water 5 months of year and is used by horses regularly ( pedestrians have to navigate the poo piles en route). The distance to the nearest bus stop will too far for some residents.
There seems no planning for cycle routes or disabled people in this application and they are protected by law against being discriminated against.
Land Ownership
This application has been based around the council managed/owned grass verges and this is not the case. Myself and my neighbours have ownership just past our stone wall, the council have never managed the verges or part of the drives that join the road. This is clearly stated on my deeds, you have never maintained this and that cost has passed to owners. This also includes the yearly cost for all of us to fill in large craters on our drive caused by cars pulling in constantly, the erosion is severe, some residents have had to add tarmac otherwise their access would disappear. In 40 years the Council have never carried out any maintenance in Angarrack Lane. There has only ever been a partial adoption this is in my deeds.
Radon Gas and Mining History
The area has a higher than normal occurrence of radon gas in the residental properties and most of the fields have capped mine shafts due to the mining history of the area. It was recommended by supporting reports from consultants in the previous application that before any work commenced, further investigation must be carried out on the site regarding Radon gas levels. It is unbelievable this reserved application has been allowed to proceed with this still unresolved.
I do not support this development in any way
Mr Charles Jones Comment submitted date: Fri 18 Oct 2024
MANUAL FOR STREETS (MfS)
This applicaton from Treveth makes a big play on MfS in relation to accessability and the environment. There is too much empty rhetoric in this application.
They state that the intended width of Angarrack Lane of 4.8 metres is as per MfS. This is untrue this is actually the width intended for the interior of estates not country roads. For country roads they recommend minimum 5.5 metres. As a result of the passing of the outline permission Treveth have saddled themselves with a road which is simply too narrow for a pavement or a cycle lane. It is too narrow for them to comply with MfS. They have no right to pretend they can comply. MfS states that streets should NOT be designed primarily for vehicles. Treveth have ignored this.
Similarly MfS states they must comply with the Disability Equality Duty of 2005. We all know of local people disabled both physically and mentally, the elderly, walkers and wheelchairs who regularly use Angarrack Lane but this latest application makes not the slightest provision for them. Residents affected by this have a right to a legal claim against the Council.
The rhetoric of Treveth stress the importance of cycling (also stated in MfS). The result? No cycle parks in the new estate, not even cycle stands at the houses (merely mentioned in the pie-in-the-sky wishlist of the TPC). No cycle lane upto Horsepool or down to Angarrack because the road is simply too narrow. MfS states bus stops should have cycle stands. Treveth have not only failed to arrange this but in one case the promised bus stop doesn't even exist.
Local Councillor Lionel Pascoe, Chairman of Planning West, should intercede and compel Adam Carlyon to withdraw this application until it is constructed in a way which is less damaging to local residents and future property owners, and truthfully complies with MfS.
Comment submitted date: Thu 17 Oct 2024
The Application makes much of the availability of public transport especially buses.
Unfortunately much of the information is false or misleading.
Bus stops: Treveth 4.3.4. states raised kerbs, shelter and information.
This is only valid for 3 out of the 6 bus stops in Connor Downs.
Horsepool northbound - no raised pavement no shelter.
Tresdale Parc southbound - no sign whatsoever to indicate a bus stop.
In addition the Tresdale Parc northbound stop is sited at a pedestrian crossing pouint and only a few yards from the T-junction into Tresdale Parc. There is no inset so traffic must queue behind the parked bus unless the driver takes their life in their hands (as some are seen to do) and illegally pass the keep left
sign on the wrong side risking an accident at the T-junction.
How Treveth can think this is a good idea is asking for serious trouble.
Regarding the buses themselves the timetables for T1 T2 and T3 are given with weekday times. Saturdays and Sundays are fewer.
Regarding the bus stops themselves where there is a shelter this will give an expected time which may or may not be accurate.
If the website worked waiting passengers would know what was happening.
Finally Treveth make great play of complying with MfS in design of the site. In fact MfS states that bus stops need to have cycle stands to encourage healthy cycling. Seems Treveth are good with empty rhetoric.
rhetoric
Comment submitted date: Thu 17 Oct 2024
Highways recommend an access at the North West side onto Prout's Lane to access the village. This makes sense.
The present plan to have pedestrian access onto the road junction at Trenawin Lane/Prouts Lane is crazy. There is no pavement at this point. What are children and dog-walkers going to do? Back in August I pointed out to Planning the danger at this junction especially with Westwood Timber intending to resume work in Trenawin Lane with their 50-ft long heavy articulated lorries. Doing nothing is not an option. Should an injury or worse occur at this point the coroner will be advised as to the contribution of Cornwall Planning.
There is stated on the documents a relevant document S278 relating to Highways. Despite reminders this has still not been placed on the planning portal. The 21 days for allowed comment should be restarted after this crucial document has appeared on the planning portal.
Mrs gail willis Comment submitted date: Fri 13 Sep 2024
My objection is to the Travel Plan. It states it wants to create community integration but fails to acknowledge the concerns of the community of Angarrack Village. We are increasingly being used as a 'rat run' when the A30 is busy and blocked which also has a knock on effect for Hayle and Connor Downs too. Loggans Moor Roundabout is a pinchpoint for access to the A30 and often has traffic queues in all directions.
These concerns were raised as objections to the initial application with requests for traffic calming or redirection to be included in the detailed planning. I can not see any mention of this in the Travel Plan.
I would also like to point out an error on the information about public travel. There are no bus stops in Angarrack Village, the nearest is located behind M&S on West Cornwall Retail Park.
Comments as of 28 Jun 2022
Mrs Alison Atkins
Comment submitted date: Tue 28 Jun 2022
Further to my previous comments, perhaps it would be useful if the Planning Committee liaise with the Education Department to ascertain the availability of school places when considering developments in Cornwall as there is no point building houses where children cannot go to school.
The Consultee comments never seem to include comments from the Education Department and that would be of paramount importance when deciding where to build family homes.
Comment submitted date: Tue 28 Jun 2022
I strongly object to this development. I have previously submitted my comments under the original planning number and those comments still stand. Please re-read all previous comments.
The new plans involve moving the entrance to the estate which will make no difference. Angarrack Lane is a LANE and will always remain so.
By removing the verges in order to widen the lane, you are taking away what little safe refuge there is for pedestrians and dog walkers.
There is no capacity at the village school to take any more children , let alone approximately 60 children from the new development in Connor Downs in Greenbank and this new proposed development which could see another 80 children living in the village. A total of an extra 140 children with no access to a local school within walking distance. The school is on a limited physical site and cannot expand.
Several times a day we would have 80 cars leaving the development for work or school run purposes.
The road at the top of Angarrack Lane is extremely busy with farm vehicles, Riviera Produce etc, going out to the packing station in Leedstown. There is always a queue of traffic up there.
One section of the applicant's documents refers to Prouts Lane which would run behind the development as a means of accessing the village by foot.
This is a muddy,overgrown single person width track which is not suitable for children or parents with pushchairs to navigate. It is also unlit and would not be safe in the Winter evenings.
The documents talk about the amenities in the village. I have lived here for over 50 years and have never seen a butchers or bakers here. Indeed our only retail premises is a small shop in the petrol station.
There are no pedestrian crossings in the village and we have a terrible problem with speeding vehicles. Despite there being a 30mph limit; we have to endure traffic racing through at speeds over 70mph.
Connor Downs has borne the brunt of development in the parish. We now have over 800 homes here. The applicant is using out of date data.
There are no work or school opportunities here so any new development would increase traffic.
Our fields must be used for food production and security particularly in these uncertain global times.
I hope that you will refuse permission for this unneccessary overdevelopment of our village.
Mr Ron Haxby
Comment submitted date: Mon 27 Jun 2022
I wish to support this application. I do not live in the area but have friends and family that do and their children are of the age looking to buy their first homes. Unfortunately due to the lack of affordable homes in the area this seems like an almost impossible task for them. I do not for the life of me understand the logic of anyone who objects to an affordable lead scheme such as this which helps keep the community alive and helps local people to remain local. This looks like a well thought out development and is being provided by Treveth, Cornwalls own housing provider so surely if anyone can provide affordable, well built homes for local people it would be them. Please Cornwall Council do not allow the fortunate few who can afford homes in the area no matter what, who are the worst type of hypocritical NIMBYs, spoil the chances of the few, by refusing this application, instead let common sense prevail and grant permission.
Mrs Marilyn Pascoe-Jones
Comment submitted date: Mon 27 Jun 2022
This proposed destruction of yet more green spaces is another nail in the coffin of the Cornwall I grew up in. The lane which these properties will be accessed by is already in regular use by locals seeking to avoid the traffic jams on the main roads between Hayle and beyond heading both north and south. These traffic jams are already causing major problems for those of us who live here trying to go about our daily business.
The noise and lorries etc associated with any kind of build will significantly impact on those living nearby.
This is a country lane, with green fields on either side, with habitat for wildlife on either side, that will be lost for ever. It is no good saying you will plant trees etc, the loss of existing trees and fields destroys the wildlife corridors that are essential to protect our already decimated flora and fauna.
Ever day there is a further planning application to build more and more and more. It has to be curtailed at some point.
Please please STOP the destruction of Cornwall.
Mrs Eirian Pascoe-Jones
Comment submitted date: Mon 27 Jun 2022
This application to build 40 homes accessed via a pleasant country lane will cause major problems to not only the residents of Connor Downs, but to the locals who use this lane to avoid the significant hold ups on the main road between Hayle and Camborne, and the A30.
It will add to delays and traffic jams, plus create noise and disruption to homes near by.
The other consideration, and to my mind, the most important, is the further destruction of habitat on a green site, affecting local wildlife populations. How many more fields, grassland and hedgerows must be lost in this relentless destruction of Cornwall?
The addition of 40 homes is yet another influx of people impacting on our local services including our local hospitals and other health services that are already bursting at the seams.
This lane gives me pleasure to drive along at the moment, please do not destroy this for monetary gain that never benefits the local residents.
Mrs Marylyn Kennard
Comment submitted date: Mon 27 Jun 2022
We object to this application on the following grounds:
Infrastructure is not there to support any more high density development. Along with all the current development in Connor Downs, schools, doctors surgeries etc are already over subscribed.
Roads are not suitable for additional traffic. The lane is narrow and the only access to this estate will be onto Angarrack Lane which is poorly maintained and already subject to more traffic than it can cope with. Angarrack is used as a bypass during peak times and frequently when the A30 is blocked by accidents etc since it is the ONLY way to avoid Loggans Moor roundabouts. Already large commercial vehicles as well as local traffic trundle through the village and this would encourage another 40 properties and their associated commercial traffic to travel down through the village. There are no footpaths on this lane and very few passing spaces but there are a lot of potholes and a bare tar surface which is very slippery especially when wet.
Although shown as "affordable" housing, properties in this development would not be affordable for most local people. There are already several new developments in Connor Downs, very little of which have proved to be affordable for those locals starting on the housing ladder.
We therefore strongly object to this devlopment.
Marylyn & Martin Kennard
Mr John White
Comment submitted date: Mon 27 Jun 2022
Can I once again strongly object to this resubmitted planning application for the same reasons I tabled in my objection to PA21/05008 Since then the traffic situation in Angarrack Lane has unfortunately got worse as local & regular holiday traffic continue to use the road as an access to Hayle etc when Roseworthy dip has it's accident & congestion problems The speed of some drivers is of concern especially for the regular horse riders cyclists runners & dog walkers that use the Lane daily The existing Lane was certainly not constructed for this increased activity & to add another 40 homes to the existing infrastructure is frankly not sustainable Finally I must agree with other objections that the impact on school doctor's & local amenities would seriously struggle with this planning application
Mrs Christine Ellis
Comment submitted date: Sun 26 Jun 2022
I object to this planning application as we haven't got enough facilities for more houses. Angarrack Road isn't safe for the extra cars that will come with the new houses.
Mr Paul Trethewey
Comment submitted date: Sun 26 Jun 2022
The description of the local services and facilities within Connor Downs in the "open space assessment" is somewhat exaggerated. The allotments in a field are shortly to be put up for sale, there is no post office (other than mobile once per week), no fish monger and the baker and butcher may be related to the farm shop.
Our property backs on to Angarrack lane which can get extremely busy during holiday periods or if there is an accident on the A30. It's hard to imagine that pedestrians and 2 vehicles will be able to use the widened lane at the same time!
3 adjoining fields are also up for sale, there has to be a limit to the number of additional properties permitted before local amenities (doctors, schools) and services (sewage etc) are overstretched.
Also with all of the recent development within Hayle, surely this area has met its quota of building for the foreseeable future.
Mrs susan elliott-rennard
Comment submitted date: Sun 26 Jun 2022
Connor Downs settlement boundary. What was the point of this if Cornwall Council can just over ride this.
The infrastructures and facilities will not be able to cope, they are struggling now
Miss Christine Keith
Comment submitted date: Sat 25 Jun 2022
I wish to object to this application for a second time and for the same reasons I objected to it last time. Connor Downs will have had nearly 200 properties built in the last 10 years. These include 30 affordable properties, which have yet to be built on the land east of Greenbank under planning reference PA19/00988. These more than meet the affordable requirements needed in the village. The Academy school is at capacity, with no room for expansion. The only amenities in the village are the garage and Spar shop and Turnpike Inn. There is a mobile post office and a fish and chip van, which come once a week. This means that everyone uses their cars to go shopping and for day to day activities This traffic will have to be added to what goes through either Connor Downs itself or through Angarrack. The amount of vehicles already speeding through the village is a great concern. Angarrack Lane is a rat run for traffic trying to avoid driving through the village at peak times. There is no room in various places for 2 cars to pass, with farm vehicles also needing to use the lane. It is probable that if the application is passed you can add a further 80 vehicles needing to enter and access the lane from an already dangerous junction at the top of Horsepool. This would also increase the traffic into Angarrack itself and I am sure the villagers living there do not want any extra traffic to head in their direction. Connor Downs Surgery is under a lot of pressure and this is before the 30 additional families who will be living in Greenbank are taken on. The original planning application for these houses under reference PA21/05008 was refused quite rightly and I trust this application will also be refused again.
Mr Ian Horne
Comment submitted date: Fri 24 Jun 2022
I submit this comment as Chairperson of Connor Downs Residents Association and following discussion with a number of residents I have been asked to forward the following on the above Planning application in Angarrack Lane.
We are concerned about the application for the developement of forty houses in Angarrack lane because :
1) The location is situated on a narrow rural lane which is hazardous to approach as a pedestrian given that at the start and finish of working days significant numbers of vehicles use the lane as a cut through, often at speeds above the posted speed limits.
2) There is no existing footpath along Angarrack Lane and very limited scope for the provision of one to facilitate a south westerly pedestrian approach to the location along its entire length, relevant to the application.
3) With a new development of forty houses presently in progress at Greenbank, Connor Downs, the existing needs of local persons able to access affordable homes will be exceeded.
4) The popular opinion is that out of date and therefore inaccurate information is being used to try to push through this application, not for the benefit of the local population but to bring into the village new development for persons wishing to move into the county from outside and for profit rather than for local need.
5) Presently there is a wait for patients wishing to see a doctor at the local surgery of four to seven days and that is before the Greenbank development comes into being. It is our argument that this application could cause a worrying strain on medical services within the village as they exist now.
6) There are very limited facilities within the village for social interaction between the existing residents consisting of a WI Hall with a lease that is nearing its end and unlikely to be renewed from our current understanding and a small Sunday School hall that has a safe capacity of around forty persons. It is noted that there is no provision made in the current application for a gathering point for residents that would occupy the development.
7) The Connor Downs Academy which provides schooling for the younger children of current village residents and those of an age that we would expect to occupy this application, is situated on a restricted site with no room for further expansion and at present is only just meeting the present and already existing future needs of the community.
8) The development would have a significant impact on the rural aspect of the current green field site and surrounding area and would be better used for much needed crop production in the era we now find ourselves living in, expanding the current boundary of the village significantly.
Mr Mark Bolt
Comment submitted date: Wed 22 Jun 2022
I am a resident of Angarrack, the access of which is via Angarrack Lane. The road is narrow and in places single track and then once in the Village the incline of the road causes traffic to travel at excess speed. This road is currently very busy and often used as a local "rat run" when there are problems on the A30. To add an additional 40 homes accessing this road will increase the flow of traffic through the village adding to the problems that already exist.